Whalen v. Whalen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Use of the abatement language [in SDCL 25-7-6.14] indicates the legislature contemplated the obligation would have already accrued when the obligor spouse seeks abatement.”
• \Use of the abatement language [in SDCL 25-7-6.14] indicates the legislature contemplated the obligation would have already accrued when the obligor spouse seeks abatement.\
• the language in a statute must be given its plain, ordinary, and popular meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Whalen v. Whalen

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Whalen v. Whalen
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-01-29· cited 17×
• Whalen v. Whalen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-23· cited 6×
• Whalen v. Whalen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-13· cited 2×
• Whalen v. Whalen
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-05-11· cited 2×
• Whalen v. Whalen
  New York Supreme Court· 1998-05-15· cited 1×
• Whalen v. Whalen
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1961-10-20
• Whalen v. Whalen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-04-08