Whalen v. Walt Disney World Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Pennsylvania courts lack personal jurisdiction over WDWCO “because Disney’s business activities in Pennsylvania are too indirect to be considered “continuous and substantial”
• out-of-state company which had brought $1.5 million of merchandise in Pennsylvania and entered into an insurance contract with a Pennsylvania company did not have continuous and substantial contacts with Pennsylvania

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).