Whalen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing sentence enhanced due to assessment of penetration points where jury's verdict did \not reflect the findings required by Blakely \
• sentence could not be enhanced unless factor supporting enhancement was shown in specific finding by jury; penetration points precluded where jury did not make specific finding of penetration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Behl v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 24×
• Gisi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-31· cited 12×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-17· cited 8×
• Moss v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19· cited 5×
• Chatman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-13· cited 4×
• Insko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-14· cited 4×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-10· cited 15×
• Dickinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 7×
• Lowman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-14· cited 6×