Whalen v. On-Deck, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “public policy in this State does not prohibit the issuance of an insurance contract that covers punitive damages”
• holding punitive damages were not uninsurable because the legislature did not “formulate[]” a “public policy . . . against such insurance’’
• “the District Court’s prediction in Valley Forge of how this Court would rule are not controlling.”
• public policy of the State did not prohibit the issuance of an insurance contract that covered punitive damages, and the controversy was remanded for a determination if the policy covered such damages
• public policy of the State did not prohibit the issuance of an insurance contract that covered punitive damages, and the controversy was remanded for a determination if the policy covered such damages
• public policy of the State did not prohibit the issuance of an insurance contract that covered punitive damages, and the controversy was remanded for a determination if the policy covered such damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).