Whalen v. Grace & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Tolliver to the extent it would permit a non-exhausting, \piggybacking\ claimant to rely upon an EEOC complaint that failed to give notice of class-wide discrimination
• entertaining and deciding an interlocutory appeal from an order granting leave to amend where the order presented a “narrow issue” that involved the “interpretation and application of legal principles” under a federal statute
• “Section 7(b) of the ADEA incorporates the enforcement ‘powers, remedies and procedures’ of § 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b
• “Section 7(b) of the ADEA incorporates the enforcement ‘powers, remedies and procedures’ of § 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b
• “[The single filing rule] allows aggrieved individuals who failed to file the required . . . EEOC charge to join a class action brought by a plaintiff who had filed an EEOC charge alleging class-wide discrimination.”
• “[The single filing rule] allows aggrieved individuals who failed to file the required . . . EEOC charge to join a class action brought by a plaintiff who had filed an EEOC charge alleging class-wide discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).