W.F. Bolin Company v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the proximity in time between the protected activity and layoff supported an inference of improper employer motivation
• stating that express union hostility combined with knowledge of union activities may infer improper motive
• reasoning that an absence of “hostility towards unionization per se” cannot overcome an otherwise supported finding of anti-union motivation for the particular employment decision
• holding that an “inference of improper employer motivation” is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues
• holding that an “inference of improper employer motivation” is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues
• reasoning that an absence of “hostility towards unionization per se” cannot overcome an otherwise supported finding of anti-union motivation for the particular employment decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).