North Dakota Supreme Court· 11/9/2005
Wetzel v. Schlenvogt
Citations
- 2005 ND 190
- 705 N.W.2d 836
- 2005 N.D. LEXIS 230
- 2005 WL 2994492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “all documents” signed by non-attorney on behalf of 17 corporation “void from the beginning”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Crothers, Maring, Kapsner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-03-24· cited 55×
- Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-11-30· cited 30×
- Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-10-01· cited 30×
- Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-10-28· cited 25×
- State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor for the Benefit of Fair Housing of the Dakotas v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-10-24· cited 21×
- Kautzman v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-22· cited 21×
- Meier v. SaidNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-02-01· cited 18×
- Interest of J.C.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-01-22· cited 18×
- Brown v. BrodellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-10-22· cited 17×
- Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 17×
- Combs v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-01-15· cited 14×
- Hanisch v. KroshusNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-03-01· cited 11×
- Hoggarth v. KroppNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-10-19· cited 11×
- Gonzalez v. WitzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-03-15· cited 10×
- Harris v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-03-16· cited 9×
- Rebel v. RebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-09-25· cited 9×
- Mead v. HatzenbellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-12-28· cited 9×
- Holbach v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-05-01· cited 8×
- Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-10-01· cited 8×
- Interest of A.P.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-03-07· cited 7×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 116×
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-07-25· cited 106×
- Carr Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1983-02-07· cited 47×
- Oahu Plumbing & Sheet Metal, Ltd. v. Kona Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-02-08· cited 46×
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 46×
- Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-12-20· cited 46×
- Berg v. Mid America Industrial, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-11-21· cited 44×
- Strong Delivery Ministry Ass'n v. Board of AppealsSeventh Circuit· 1976-10-27· cited 44×
- Gullickson v. KlineNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-04-13· cited 40×
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-16· cited 36×
- Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. v. Longview Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-20· cited 27×
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. TurnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-07-02· cited 26×
- Cusey v. NagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-05-03· cited 25×
- Wishnatsky v. HueyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 24×
- Skadberg v. SkadbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-06-04· cited 22×
- State v. NiskaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 21×
- Tibor v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-30· cited 20×
- United Accounts, Inc. v. Teladvantage, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-27· cited 19×
- In Re Estate of KimbrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-06-02· cited 13×
- Baker v. MayerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-06-03· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.