Skip to main content
· 11/25/1981

Wetzel v. Goldsmith (In Re Comstock)

Citations

  • 16 B.R. 206
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that court’s inherent right to control vexatious practices is “similar in thrust and effect to Idaho Code 12-121”
  • state law governs attorneys' fees award in case removed from state to bankruptcy court
  • interpreting former I.C. § 12-120(2) as providing a substantive remedy
  • interpreting former I.C. § 12-120(2) as providing a substantive remedy
  • interpreting former I.C. § 12-120(2) as providing a substantive remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merlin S. Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.