Skip to main content
· 5/1/1906

Wetzel & T. Ry. Co. v. Tennis Bros.

Citations

  • 145 F. 458
  • 75 C.C.A. 266
  • 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A court may deny a second deposition even if relevant documents are produced subsequent to the [first] deposition if the party taking the deposition . . . chose to conduct the deposition prior to the completion of document discovery.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waddirr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.