Skip to main content
· 5/24/2007

Wetherell v. Douglas County

Citations

  • 160 P.3d 614
  • 342 Or. 666
  • 2007 Ore. LEXIS 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we should not look at one subsection of a statute in a vacuum but should construe “each part together with the other parts in an attempt to produce a harmonious whole”
  • explaining that the various parts of a statute should be construed together
  • explaining that the court should not look at one subsection of a statute in a vacuum but should construe “each part together with the other parts in an attempt to produce a harmonious whole”
  • court’s task in construing administrative rules is same as for statutes: to discern meaning of words used, giving effect to intent of body that promulgated rule
  • evidence regard- ing profit is not categorically irrelevant to the determination of whether land is suitable for farm use under ORS 215.203 and Goal 3 in the first instance
  • evidence regard- ing profit is not categorically irrelevant to the determination of whether land is suitable for farm use under ORS 215.203 and Goal 3 in the first instance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer, De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Ristler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.