Wetherbee v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s statements were “qualifiedly privileged” and providing “alternative[]” reasons as to why that was the case
• explaining that because the defendant’s statements “were qualifiedly privileged,” the “question then bec[a]me[] whether [the] plaintiff raised a fact question as to whether [the] defendant abused her privilege”
• explaining that so long as an employee acts with proper authority and acts in part to benefit the employer, “it is immaterial that the actor has additional motives-even improper ones”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).