Skip to main content
· 10/31/1995

Wetch v. Wetch

Citations

  • 539 N.W.2d 309
  • 1995 N.D. LEXIS 194
  • 1995 WL 637578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for abuse of discretion the trial court’s refusal to consider evidence of domestic violence prior to stipulated judgment
  • explaining res judicata precludes claims raised in prior actions between the same parties, which were resolved by final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction
  • following “substantial persuasive authority that when the original custody decree is entered upon default or based upon a stipulation of the parties, a trial court errs by refusing to consider pre-divorce conduct on the change of custody issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Meschke, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.