Westvaco Corporation v. International Paper Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “bald assertion” that prior art reference “clearly discloses all of the limitations of claim 33” was insufficient to show district court erred in ruling that anticipation had not been proved by clear and convincing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).