Westrom v. Westrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, if this commentary is binding under Nasir, it may require determining the meaning of the same term in different section of the Guidelines on a case-by-case basis
• “preservation requires advancement of the same legal principle, not citation to the same legal precedent”
• “preservation requires advancement of the same legal principle, not citation to the same legal precedent”
• “[P]reservation requires advancement of the same legal principle, not citation to the same legal precedent.”
• argument is preserved only when “it ‘depend[s] on both the same legal rule and the same facts as the argument presented in the District Court’”
• parties must present arguments to a district court with “sufficient[] particulari[ty]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).