Westport Insurance v. Hanft & Knight, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although no Pennsylvania court has directly addressed application of prior knowledge exclusion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has predicted the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would apply subjective-objective standard
• “Pennsylvania law is clear that the use of the term ‘any insured’ in these exclusions, rather than ‘the insured,’ bars coverage for innocent co-insureds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).