Westport Ins. Corp. v. Lilley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must decide whether a reasonable attorney in possession of the facts known to the party in the case would reasonably foresee that a malpractice claim was forthcoming, and that such test incorporates objective and subjective elements.
• “[T]he Court must decide whether a reasonable attorney in possession of such knowledge would reasonably foresee that a malpractice claim might be forthcoming. This test incorporates both subjective and objective elements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).