Weston v. Chamberlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile court lacked inherent authority to set aside a judgment, where a parent alleged that the Department of Human Services had given false testimony in court and otherwise engaged in intrinsic fraud, as that is not a basis for set aside under ORCP 71 C
• “A court’s inherent authority does not extend to setting aside a judgment for intrinsic fraud, that is, fraud that consists of acts that per- tain to the merits of the case, such as perjured testimony.” (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.
• “A court’s inherent authority does not extend to setting aside a judgment for intrinsic fraud, that is, fraud that consists of acts that per- tain to the merits of the case, such as perjured testimony.” (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “A court’s inherent authority does not extend to setting aside a judgment for intrinsic fraud, that is, fraud that consists of acts that per- tain to the merits of the case, such as perjured testimony.” (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.
• “A court’s inherent authority does not extend to setting aside a judgment for intrinsic fraud, that is, fraud that consists of acts that per- tain to the merits of the case, such as perjured testimony.” (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).