Skip to main content

Westmeyer v. Flynn

Citations

  • 889 N.E.2d 671
  • 382 Ill. App. 3d 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[e]fforts to pierce the corporate veil are governed by the law of the state of incorporation.”
  • recognizing holding in Miner that a judgment creditor can file a new action to seek to pierce the corporate veil of a judgment debtor and hold individual shareholders and directors liable
  • applying Delaware law to determine whether the plaintiff could pierce the corporate veil in a declaratory judgment action to collect a judgment against an insolvent corporation from the corporation’s owners
  • reversing the dismissal of a veil-piercing action against a member of a Delaware limited liability company but finding that the result would the same under Illinois law
  • applying Delaware law to analyze a veil-piercing claim involving a Delaware limited liability company
  • res judicata bars issues that could have been raised as well as those that were litigated in the prior suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Westmeyer v. Flynn

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.