Westlake v. Knowles
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3277
Syllabus
R.C. 2919.22(A); child endangerment; motion to continue; motion for new counsel; abuse of discretion; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; substantial risk of harm. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant-appellant's untimely request for new counsel and corresponding request for a continuance of trial. Defendant-appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Flagg Lanzinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.