Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. New York City Transit Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “section 2244(d) does not permit the reinitiation 15 of the limitations period that has ended before the state petition was filed”
• holding summary judgment is improper when a jury should 15 evaluate the credibility and weight of the extensive conflicting evidence
• “decision shall be conclusive, final and binding on the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).