· 4/27/1976
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 551 P.2d 847
- 17 Cal. 3d 259
- 131 Cal. Rptr. 231
- 1976 Cal. LEXIS 293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- also noting that ‘[t]he change of venue issue is directed at completely different policy considerations’ and that ‘[i]t is inappropriate to apply a “minimum contacts” test to determine whether defendants are doing business’ in a given county for venue purposes
- also noting that \[l]he change of venue issue is directed at completely different policy considerations” and that \[i]t is inappropriate to apply a ‘minimum contacts' test to determine whether defendants are doing business” in a given county for venue purposes
- also noting that \[t]he change of venue issue is directed at completely different policy considerations\ and that \[i]t is inappropriate to apply a `minimum contacts' test to determine whether defendants are doing business\ in a given county for venue purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.