Skip to main content
· 8/29/2008

Westfield Insurance v. Sheehan Construction Co.

Citations

  • 580 F. Supp. 2d 701
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66843
  • 2008 WL 4099007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under Indiana law, “damage to the otherwise non-defective parts of the houses damaged by faulty workmanship” does not constitute property damage
  • holding that, under Indiana law, “damage to the otherwise non- defective parts of the houses damaged by faulty workmanship” does not constitute property damage
  • concluding that policy did not cover damage of plaintiffs’ on whose behalf counsel had contacted insured prior to issuance of policy, but noting that such exclusion did not apply to other class members’ damage
  • noting under Indiana law that in general two types of risk arise from a contractor's work: the (uncovered) business risk that a contractor will have to pay to repair faulty workmanship; and the (covered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.