Skip to main content
· 3/21/2001

Westfield Insurance Companies v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 623 N.W.2d 871
  • 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 42
  • 2001 WL 274704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing why the pro-rata approach is better than the closest-to-the risk test, which is a variant of the total-poliecy-insuring-intent test
  • stating when we review for correction of errors at law, “we determine whether the district court correctly applied the law” to the undisputed facts
  • stating when we review for correction of errors at law, “we determine whether the district court correctly applied the law” to the undisputed facts
  • “Under Iowa law, it is not necessary to prove prejudice to establish estoppel by acquiescence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, McGIVERIN, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.