Westfield Ins. v. Wausau Business Ins.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s acquaintance, business transactions, ownership of the home where the co-conspirator lived, and unreported income was sufficient to prove that a conspiracy existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).