Western World Insurance Co. v. Mary Armbruster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Court’s discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act “must not be unguided”
• explaining that Court’s discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act “must not be unguided”
• explaining that Court’s discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act “must not be unguided”
• finding that under the fourth factor, the case did not raise concerns about federalism “such that the district court should decline jurisdiction” in part because the case did “not raise novel or difficult questions of state law”
• finding the fourth factor weighs in favor of retaining jurisdiction when the case does not raise novel or difficult questions of state law
• affirming district court’s exercise of jurisdiction over insurance contract declaratory action where there were no “serious concerns about federal encroachment on the state courts …”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).