Skip to main content
· 6/26/2009

Western Watersheds Project v. Hall

Citations

  • 338 F. App'x 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ajpplying the Amended Homestead Exemption to bankruptcy cases filed after its effective date is, in fact, a prospective application of the amendment.” (citing In re Pursley, 2014 WL 293557, at (Bankr.N.D.Ohio Jan. 23, 2014)
  • “Inconsistent state laws are preempted by conflicting Bankruptcy Code provisions.” (citing Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Weinstein (In re Weinstein), 164 F.3d 677, 682-83 (1st Cir. 1999))
  • “[B]oth the Bankruptcy Code and Ohio Exemption Statute point to the bankruptcy petition filing date as the crucial date for determining a debt- or’s entitlement to specific exemptions, including the homestead exemption, and the appropriate amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Fisher, Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.