Western Watersheds Project v. Bob Abbey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an agency errs when it relies on old data without showing that the data remain accurate”
• holding that when modification of grazing practices was not considered at programmatic level, it must be given hard and careful look at site-specific level
• holding that when modification of grazing practices was not considered at programmatic level, it must be given hard and careful look at site-specific level
• holding that “an agency errs when it relies on old data without showing that the data remain accurate”
• holding that BLM’s environmental assessment was deficient where the agency only meaningfully analyzed alternatives that reflected the same level of grazing
• holding that EA’s consideration of alternatives was improper where three action alternatives and no-action alternative all “considered issuing a new grazing permit at the same grazing level as the previous permit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).