Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that documents prepared at an accountant’s request to allow the preparation of financial reports required by the federal securities laws are not protected by the work product privilege, while noting that “[t]he case presents a close question”
• documents generated for business purpose of creating financial statements which would satisfy requirements of federal securities laws not protected by work-product privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).