Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Preston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the jury did not disregard, but disbelieved, the defendants’ expert opinion that the vibration levels could not have caused the damage which was preexisting and naturally occurring because it had been contradicted by plaintiffs’ lay witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).