Skip to main content
· 5/30/1906

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Holtby

Citations

  • 139 Ky. 458
  • 93 S.W. 652
  • 1906 Ky. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment in applicant’s favor; “Now, with Islam’s petition pending just shy of six years, and with no indication from defendants of when or whether he can expect any decision in the future, the day prophesied in Islam I has arrived.”
  • “[T]he government has a non-discretionary duty to adjudicate such a petition ‘within a reasonable period of time.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.