Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Caumissar & Sons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's testimony of emotional harm was sufficient to create a question of fact for the jury in an FCRA case
• noting that plaintiff may recover actual damages for humiliation, mental distress or injury to reputation and creditworthiness
• describing the standard as “more than merely allowing for the possibility of accuracy” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).