Western Transportation Company v. Wilson and Company, Inc. And Wilson Foods Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that: “[T]he district court did not have the power to declare the [billing notation] requirement unreasonable. Only the ICC can do that____”
• “If [a tariff] is ambiguous, it should be construed like any other contract. But if it is unambiguous, the parties are bound by its terms and the aids to construction are irrelevant.”
• applying Western Pacific to independent petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).