Western Stone Co. v. Whalen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reciting facts \taken from the parties' stipulated facts and exhibits\ on appeal from ruling on cross motions for summary judgment, which was \based on the parties' stipulated facts and exhibits\
• public interest is not limited to insuring efficient and lawful government operations but also includes achieving broad access to government records
• there may be \greater privacy interest in a compilation of personal information\
• \Today's current information may be tomorrow's record protected from public view . . . . To examine the Globe's request in a vacuum is to ignore that an index from the present is entwined with indices from the future\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).