Western Parcel Exp. v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that purported “exclusive dealing contracts” constituted a barrier to entry where contracts were of short duration, easily terminable, and did not prevent consumers from also contracting with competitors
• finding volume discount contracts did not. constitute exclusive dealing because they were short term, terminable for any reason, and “did not foreclose consumers from entering into contracts with other delivery service providers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).