Skip to main content
· 7/10/1928

Western Oil Refining Co. v. Jones

Citations

  • 27 F.2d 205
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court chose to “pass” evidence of subsequent user’s “intended deception” and instead placed holding on the ground of the “normal expansions of the business”
  • “Silver Flash” infringed by “Super-Flash”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moorman, Denison, MacK, Moor-Man

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.