Western North Carolina Land Co. v. Scaife

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that rule was based principally on the practical reality that without it, a multitude of suits would result from large distributions of published matter and purpose of statute of limitations would be eviscerated
• “[T]he vast majority of cases ... hold that the release of miscellaneous copies incidental to the general publication ... does not constitute a new publication or create a new cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).