· 6/14/1985
Western Marine Electronics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Furuno Electric Co., Ltd., Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 764 F.2d 840
- 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 334
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- totality of the circumstances relating to the character and extent of commercial activities must be considered under section 102
- offer to sell without restriction evidences primarily commercial and not experimental purpose
- “The trial court properly recognized that testing or experimentation performed with respect to non-claimed features of the device does not show that the invention was the subject of experimentation.“
- “The trial court properly recognized that testing or experimentation performed with respect to non-claimed features of the device does not show that the invention was the subject of experimentation.“
- A The trial court properly recognized that testing or experimentation performed with respect to non‑claimed features of the device does not show that the invention was the subject of experimentation. A
- court should consider totality of circumstances including “the type of invention”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Markey, Baldwin, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.