Western Investments, Inc. v. Urena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although landlord could have provided greater security measures, there was no evidence that any such security measures would have actually prevented the assault that occurred
• recognizing that “[p]remises liability is a special form of negligence” and that “[n]egligence and premises liability . . . involve closely related but distinct duty analyses”
• recognizing that “[p]remises liability is a special form of negligence” and that “[n]egligence and premises liability . . . involve closely related but distinct duty analyses”
• holding that summary judgment was proper when there was no evidence that any of premises owner’s “acts or omissions were a substantial factor in causing” plaintiff’s injuries
• holding that summary judgment was proper when there was no evidence that any of the premises owner's “acts or omissions were a substantial factor in causing” the plaintiff's injuries
• holding that merely furnishing condition making injury possible is not cause in fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).