Western Energy Alliance v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that final- judgment rule “forestall[s] the delay, harassment, expense, and duplication that could result from multiple or ill-timed appeals” (emphasis added
• stating that courts could alternatively construe a ruling as final based on practical considerations
• refusing to apply practical-finality doctrine where appellants would “have later opportunities to raise their arguments on appeal” and appeal was “not urgent”
• “[J]u-risdiction is a threshold question which an appellate court must resolve before addressing the merits of the matter before it.” (alteration in original) (quoting Timpanogos Tribe v. Conway, 286 F.3d 1195, 1201 (10th Cir. 2002))
• discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1291’s finality requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).