· 12/27/1976
Western Electric Co. v. Stern
Citations
- 551 F.2d 1
- 14 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 74
- 22 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 938
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703
- 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that summary judgment based on the statute of limitations is a final judgment on the merits for purposes of res judicata
- noting that the “nonparty shareholders are bound by judgments if their interests were adequately represented”
- finding privity for purposes of res judicata in stockholder derivative actions arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1, prior to Semtek
- “A summary judgment on the basis of the defense of the statute of limitations is a judgment on the merits.”
- “[I]n shareholder derivative actions arising under [Federal Rule of' Civil Procedure] 23.1, parties and their privies include the corporation and all nonparty shareholders.”
- “A summary judgment on the basis of the defense of the statute of limitations is a judgment on the merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldi, Gibbons, Seitz, Sert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.