Skip to main content
· 12/27/1976

Western Electric Co. v. Stern

Citations

  • 551 F.2d 1
  • 14 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 74
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 938
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703
  • 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary judgment based on the statute of limitations is a final judgment on the merits for purposes of res judicata
  • noting that the “nonparty shareholders are bound by judgments if their interests were adequately represented”
  • finding privity for purposes of res judicata in stockholder derivative actions arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1, prior to Semtek
  • “A summary judgment on the basis of the defense of the statute of limitations is a judgment on the merits.”
  • “[I]n shareholder derivative actions arising under [Federal Rule of' Civil Procedure] 23.1, parties and their privies include the corporation and all nonparty shareholders.”
  • “A summary judgment on the basis of the defense of the statute of limitations is a judgment on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldi, Gibbons, Seitz, Sert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.