Western Electric Co. v. LaRue
Citations
- 139 U.S. 601
- 11 S. Ct. 670
- 35 L. Ed. 294
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2412
Syllabus
<p>A telegraph sounder constructed under letters patent No. 352,317, granted November 9, 1886, to Charles D. Haskins, infringes the third claim of letters patent No. 270,767 for a new and useful improvement in telegraph keys, viz., “The combination, in a telegraph key, of the lever fulcrumedupon the torsional spring, with the adjusting screws H H', for regulating the amplitude of the lever movement and the retractile resistance of the torsion-spring, substantially as described.”</p> <p>While the promotion of an old device, such, for instance, as a torsional spring, to a new sphere of action, in which it performs a new function, involves invention, the transfer or adaptation of the same device to a similar sphere of action, where it performs substantially the same function, does not involve invention.</p> <p>Winans v. Denmead, 15 How. 330, affirmed and applied.</p>
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 150×
- Reece Button-Hole Ma. Co. v. Globe Button-Hole Ma. Co.First Circuit· 1894-04-20· cited 80×
- France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Sixth Circuit· 1939-09-18· cited 56×
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Superior Drill Co.Sixth Circuit· 1902-04-08· cited 39×
- Talon, Inc. v. Union Slide Fastener, Inc., Union Slide Fastener, Inc. v. Talon, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1959-04-23· cited 36×
- Kings County Raisin & Fruit Co. v. United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co.Ninth Circuit· 1910-10-03· cited 28×
- Armstrong v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.Second Circuit· 1922-03-13· cited 28×
- Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Ninth Circuit· 1936-09-08· cited 27×
- Watson v. StevensFirst Circuit· 1892-09-06· cited 27×
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Stanley Instrument Co.First Circuit· 1904-09-09· cited 25×
- National Tube Co. v. AikenSixth Circuit· 1908-07-11· cited 23×
- George Frost Co. v. CohnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1901-12-31· cited 20×
- Deitel v. La Minuette Trading Co.Second Circuit· 1930-01-06· cited 16×
- Etten v. KauffmanThird Circuit· 1941-06-17· cited 15×
- Panduit Corporation v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.W.D. Michigan· 1969-04-11· cited 14×
- Smith v. American Electric Rabbit Racing Ass'nE.D. Louisiana· 1927-07-23· cited 12×
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. CohnNinth Circuit· 1913-08-04· cited 12×
- Bossert Electric Const. Co. v. Pratt Chuck Co.Second Circuit· 1910-05-23· cited 11×
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.N.D. Illinois· 1972-10-04· cited 10×
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Duplex Phonograph Co.W.D. Michigan· 1909-05-27· cited 9×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.