Skip to main content
· 4/26/1985

Western Electric Co. v. Gilliam

Citations

  • 329 S.E.2d 13
  • 229 Va. 245
  • 1985 Va. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[f]or purposes of this opinion, we accept the Commission’s factual finding that tenosynovitis is a disease”
  • tenosynovitis in hand of assembly line worker not occupational disease, because general public also susceptible
  • tenosynovitis in hand of assembly line worker not occupational disease, because general public also susceptible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.