Western Electric Co. v. Anthracite Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining plaintiff's motion to compel, in part because its “general challenge to ‘conclusory’ language in the privilege log [wal]s insufficient”
• “This Court concludes that a claimed exception to the privilege, because the litigation involves a question concerning the intent of the governmental decisionmakers or the decisionmaking process itself, is subject to the five factor balancing test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).