Skip to main content
· 3/22/1983

Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Budrus

Citations

  • 332 N.W.2d 837
  • 112 Wis. 2d 348
  • 1983 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that loss of use of a field occasioned by the negligent sale of mistagged seed constituted an “occurrence”
  • liberally construing a complaint to include a claim for loss of . use of tangible property
  • liberally construing a complaint to include a claim for loss of use of tangible property
  • \loss of use\ exclusion did not apply to action against insured for negligently selling mistagged seed which resulted in crop loss because product delivered went beyond merely failing to meet represented level of performance
  • “loss of use” exclusion did not apply to action against insured for negligently selling mistagged seed which resulted in crop loss because product delivered went beyond merely failing to meet represented level of performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Dean, Cane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.