Skip to main content
· 11/13/2014

Western Capital Partners, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Compa

Citations

  • 771 F.3d 391
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21527
  • 2014 WL 5858965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that title insurance is aimed at risks in existence on the date the policy is issued rather future risks
  • observing that title insurance “is fundamentally different from general liability insurance” because it is aimed “at risks that are already in existence on the date the policy is issued” rather than at future risks
  • explaining that “title insurance is fundamentally different from general lability insurance in that it is aimed at risks that are already in existence on the date the policy is issued rather than at future risks”
  • explaining that Illinois follows the “complete defense” rule, “which generally requires an insurer to provide a complete defense in a suit or action against its insured even if only one or some of the claims are potentially covered”
  • declining to apply the complete defense rule to a title insurance dispute under Illinois law
  • “The complete-defense rule reflects and enforces the broad defense promise in standard general liability policies and makes sense given the comprehensive coverage provided by this kind of insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.