Skip to main content
· 2/16/2001

Western Capital Design, LLC v. New York Mercantile Exchange

Citations

  • 180 F. Supp. 2d 438
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1590
  • 2001 WL 167699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that alleging an exchange’s “gross indifference to enforcing its floor rules governing outside trading” did not sufficiently establish bad faith
  • reasoning that an exchange’s failure to enforce rules may be due to “negligent inattention”
  • dismissing complaint “entirely” because it could “not stand against only unnamed, unserved defendants”
  • dismissing complaint “entirely” because it could “not stand against only unnamed, unserved defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hellerstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.