Westerheide v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the previous statute, trial courts were not authorized to weigh conflicting evidence, but rather were limited to evaluating the sufficiency of petitioners’ evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burgal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 33×
• In Re Commitment of Allen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-12· cited 13×
• Barron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12· cited 7×
• Spivey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-16· cited 6×
• Chukes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-22· cited 5×
• Holder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-11· cited 4×
• Fuery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-07· cited 2×
• Spivey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-19· cited 1×
• Kakuk v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-17· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-13· cited 1×
• Stumpf v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-29
• Alvaro Ignacio Abaunza v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Foucha v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 1,348×
• Westerheide v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 152×
• Burgal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 33×
• In Re Estate of Ziy
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1969-05-14· cited 7×
• Tavares v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-08· cited 5×