· 11/18/2013
Westcott v. Phelps
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 657
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 434
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3299
- 571 U.S. 1032
- 2013 WL 5594748
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “voluntary dismissal of a complaint . . . does not preclude the district court from considering collateral issues such as sanctions”
- holding that “voluntary dismissal of a complaint . . . does not preclude the district court from considering collateral issues such as sanctions”
- stating that under federal law, the defense of equitable estoppel requires inter alia a showing that the estopped party knowingly concealed or made a misrepresentation
- stating that federal rule 65(c) “employs the term ‘security,’ which includes bonds,” and that, “[t]ypically, bonds securing [an injunction] are posted by a surety, while ‘security’ includes amounts deposited directly by the plaintiff into the court”
- discussing a court’s authority to consider “collateral issues” such as sanctions “after an action is no longer pending.”
- district court can award damages under Rule 65(c) sustained as a result of injunction notwithstanding voluntary dismissal of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.