Skip to main content
· 11/18/2013

Westcott v. Phelps

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 657
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 434
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3299
  • 571 U.S. 1032
  • 2013 WL 5594748
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “voluntary dismissal of a complaint . . . does not preclude the district court from considering collateral issues such as sanctions”
  • holding that “voluntary dismissal of a complaint . . . does not preclude the district court from considering collateral issues such as sanctions”
  • stating that under federal law, the defense of equitable estoppel requires inter alia a showing that the estopped party knowingly concealed or made a misrepresentation
  • stating that federal rule 65(c) “employs the term ‘security,’ which includes bonds,” and that, “[t]ypically, bonds securing [an injunction] are posted by a surety, while ‘security’ includes amounts deposited directly by the plaintiff into the court”
  • discussing a court’s authority to consider “collateral issues” such as sanctions “after an action is no longer pending.”
  • district court can award damages under Rule 65(c) sustained as a result of injunction notwithstanding voluntary dismissal of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.