Westcliff Co. v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no evidence of the defendant’s intent to defraud a third party because the defendant did not know when he made the misrepresentations in the third party’s presence that the third party was interested in purchasing the property
• holding that there was no evidence of the defendant’s intent to defraud a third party because the defendant did not know when he made the misrepresentations in the third party’s presence that the third party was interested in purchasing the property
• holding that there was no evidence of the defendant = s intent to defraud a third party because the defendant did not know when he made the misrepresentations in the third party = s presence that the third party was interested in purchasing the property
• party not responsible for misrepresentations made to third party in the absence of intent to induce reliance by the third party
• “Person making a representation is accountable for truth of such statement only to person or persons whom he sought to influence by such representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).