Westbrook Navigator L.L.C. v. Navistar, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosure obligation was triggered for debtor whose estate was the relator in a qui tam action
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to deny leave to amend where the plaintiff “had the opportunity to cure and failed”
• holding that drafting and disclosing a complaint was sufficient to show knowledge
• stating that “the statute attaches liability, not to the underlying fraudulent activity or to the government’s wrongful payment, but to the claim for payment” (quoting Longhi, 575 F.3d at 467)
• noting that “a trustee does not abandon a claim that the debtor has failed to disclose”
• affirming the district court’s dismissal where the plaintiff had an opportunity to cure the specified defects in his complaint and failed to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).